[Dev] Feedback on repository documents requested

[Ted Leung]

On Oct 21, 2004, at 5:38 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:

>
>> 1) A general overview of how the repository fits in with the rest of 
>> Chandler would be helpful. I think it's implicit in the doc that the 
>> repository can be used separately and also as part of the Chandler 
>> PIM. Would be clearer if this were made explicit. Thus, this doc 
>> addresses both people who want to develop parcels on top of the 
>> Chandler PIM and also parcels completely independent of the Chandler 
>> PIM.
>
> Actually, developing parcels is a Chandler activity, the repository 
> doesn't understand parcels, they are a funtionality introduced in a 
> layer above the repository.

We need a general architectural overview document that helps put things 
into context when talking about Chandler.  The point of this document 
is to help people get started, particularly in the context of Chandler. 
  So while Chandler/parcels/repository is layered, the document doesn't 
go to great lengths to point this out.

Ted