[Design] [cosmo] [proposal] Detail View

[Mikeal Rogers]

> But, if the risk is about the same and the development and QA time is
> about the same, I would encourage us to explore the web-centric UI.
> Maybe because we would be using standard collapse/expand panels the
> risk to get something that fits in a standard browser-size window
> could be less than porting the Chandler desktop design.

Well i can elaborate on the QA time.

We have this amazing tool for automating all of our web UI tests :)  
Everything gets automated as soon as it drops, the differences in  
time for writing the automation of one plan as opposed to the other  
is probably around 30 minutes, if that. All the plumbing and  
controller actions are already in windmill to automate both plans. I  
think the QA impact is somewhere near zero for the newer web centric  
plan.

-Mikeal
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/attachments/20070507/134e4b2a/PGP.pgp