[Design] Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed
randy at osafoundation.org
Tue Dec 18 17:11:20 PST 2007
Brian Moseley wrote:
> a uid is no longer a uuid if multiple items share it. every item
> should have a uuid if for no other reason than that we can use that to
> unambiguously locate it within a federated database.
I was thinking there would be a "clientUuid" property in addition to a
uuid. ClientUuid would be unique within a collection and is what would
relate items in different collections.
> web ui to a sync model as opposed to a live query model. it's not
> longer sufficient for the web ui to ask for a list of items in a
I still think this could work for a live query model., at least in the
short term. The client can ask for items in one or more collections, and
in the case where it receives an item that exists in multiple
collections, it displays the most recent data. Conflict resolution
would be nice though.
More information about the Design