[Design] [Cosmo][DF][Sum] Using the Account Browser to restore a lost Chandler repo

Mimi Yin mimi at osafoundation.org
Wed Apr 11 09:43:40 PDT 2007

I can see that. So then I would recommend having it by application  
rather than technology, which is also consistent with the way we do  
Subscribe in the end-user UI:

+ Chandler Desktop
+ Chandler Hub
+ Cosmo or Chandler Server (whatever we end up calling it)


On Apr 11, 2007, at 9:23 AM, Brian Moseley wrote:

> On 4/11/07, Mimi Yin <mimi at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>> I understand the current ambiguity around what the word Chandler
>> actually means.  However, moving forward, all of our marketing
>> material will try to beat into people's brains that Chandler =
>> Desktop + Hub + Server... so that we can avoid exactly this kind of
>> scenario where we end up with a lot of extra copy whenever we need to
>> refer to things that work for the entire Chandler enchilada.
> while "the whole enchilada" is a concept that may work in a large
> sense, when somebody's trying to figure out what's going to happen
> when they click a link or a button, i think we need to be a little
> more explicit.
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

More information about the Design mailing list