[Design] [cosmo] [proposal] Process for UI review

[Matthew Eernisse]

+1 to lightweight.

Bobby Rullo wrote:
> I think there is an order of operations problem here.
> 
> If there are bugs which have UI that is not specced out, the developers 
> should talk to PPD first, so that there is less chance of having to 
> re-do the work.
> 
> Secondly, I agree that PPD should review stuff, but it is sort of 
> annoying to have to manually re-assign stuff to PPD after each bug fix. 
> Is there a way to add this into the bugzilla workflow, so that it goes
> 
> ASSIGNED --> FIXED --> UI-VERIFIED --> VERIFIED
> 
> If not, we can adapt. Just trying to keep the process as light as possible.
> 
> On Apr 9, 2007, at 4:43 PM, Ted Leung wrote:
> 
>> +1.   Assigning the bug to a designer seems like the best way to 
>> ensure that things get looked at, since we use the bug lists to 
>> monitor the status of a release.
>>
>> Ted
>>
>> On Apr 9, 2007, at 9:57 AM, Priscilla Chung wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to propose as part of the process, when there are bugs which 
>>> impact the user and may not have been completely spec-ed out yet, I'd 
>>> like to encourage developers to send an e-mail to the design list or 
>>> reassign the bug back to UI design so that we can review it before 
>>> marking the bug fixed?
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any objections or a better suggestion?
>>> -Priscilla
>>>
>>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>>
>>> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
>>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>>
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
> 
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> 
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>