[Design] [Sum] Nov 13-19th

Sheila Mooney sheila at osafoundation.org
Mon Nov 27 00:03:09 PST 2006


A bunch of my design mail is getting put in another folder. Sorry,  
there are a few items in this week's summary that should have been  
for last week.

Also, there are actually several conversations going on in the Cosmo  
Login-related workflows update thread. The bits in the design list  
summaries haven't been very clear. I will summarize this thread  
independently so it makes more sense.

New Threads:

Priscilla proposed we defer free-busy work targeted for Cosmo 0.6 to  
post Preview.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2006-November/ 
005674.html
Sheila replied to a thread on the Cosmo with a proposal to defer the  
work to handle free-busy in the Cosmo UI until post Preview. The dev  
team had this on the plan for 0.6 and since it scoped out as a couple  
of weeks, the PPD team brought up the notion of cutting it.
+ From a user standpoint, our casual collaborator doesn't really need  
this feature for Preview.
+ The developers felt otherwise and didn't think the cost was that  
high. Cosmo can generate free-busy tickets whether or not they are  
used by Chandler or the Cosmo UI.
+ Users can then click on these free-busy URLs and we need to handle  
them somehow.
+ Priscilla suggested a dialog saying the feature is not supported.
+ Conclusion: We decided that for now we would use the dialog that  
Priscilla suggested. As a side project we can work on figuring out  
our free-busy interop story and also get a better handle on the  
Chandler free-busy bugs and determine if we can deal with all the  
issues for Preview. Once we do that, we can use the time allotted for  
the free-busy estimates to do some free-busy work as it applies to  
interop goals.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2006-November/ 
005689.html

Philippe forwarded some important instructions for users upgrading to  
the latest Alpha4 checkpoint of Chandler. Due to a problem found with  
our hosted service migration from cosmo-demo to osaf.us, we needed to  
fix a bug in Chandler that breaks compatibility with old data. This  
means that users have to start with a fresh Chandler repository and  
fresh shared data. The only way you can backup your existing data and  
move it over is to export all your calendars, re-import and re-share  
all the collections.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2006-November/ 
005681.html

Priscilla, Mimi and the Cosmo team met to review and discus the list  
of UI elements we want to have in the Cosmo UI for Preview. She also  
attached the notes.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2006-November/ 
005682.html

Priscilla sent out a brief message with an update of where we are on  
our screenshot design for the Cosmo Preview UI. They should be out soon.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2006-November/ 
005703.html

Sheila forwarded a list of the top 10 perceived performance problems  
(from a dogfooder perspective). We want to here from others if there  
are any we are forgetting.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2006-November/ 
005734.html

Mimi sent out a new proposal for the magic URL, login and subscribe  
workflows we are going to handle in Cosmo 0.6. Now that we are going  
to handle more than just events for Preview in the Cosmo UI, Mimi and  
Priscilla wanted to rework the screenshots we had done for 0.6 in  
anticipation of these new features. They scheduled a design review  
with the Cosmo team.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2006-November/ 
005738.html

Priscilla also sent out some proposals for the Cosmo Preview UI, as  
well as the post-Preview possibilities. We are aiming for something  
simple in Preview but the developers wanted a bit more information  
about our future design ideas.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2006-November/ 
005741.html

Continued Discussions:

Matthew had some further comments on the bare minimum for the Preview  
casual collaborator Cosmo UI.
+ Matthew had some questions about the use of the cancel button in  
the detail view. He thought the use of the word Cancel meant we were  
stopping an operation and we should consider "revert" instead since  
the behavior we want is to revert the changes I have made.
+ Priscilla commented that it seemed more intuitive to just click  
away and get prompted asking if you want to save the changes.
+ Mimi replied that Google Calendar uses Cancel, so does Yahoo  
calendar and hotmail calendar. Mimi thinks that people might be too  
afraid to click away, something more explicit will let them know  
their changes won't be saved.
+ Priscilla said that the better behavior is to have all the changes  
saved like Chandler - when you actually edit a field and tab out.
+ After some initial analysis by Matthew, this is probably too  
ambitious for Preview.
+ Mimi explained her position but doesn't feel strongly about the  
"Cancel" button, if we consider any of the proposals.
+ Conclusion: Still waiting for resolution on this one.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2006-November/ 
005687.html

There was further discussion about the In Out collection logic  
proposal refinements. This is pretty detailed and gets into some  
implementation details. I think it's best we summarize in a separate  
email since it's a lengthy discussion.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2006-November/ 
005686.html

The lengthy Cosmo Login-related workflows update thread took yet  
another fork and started to get into the implementation details.  
Matthew suggested the discussion move to the cosmo dev list.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2006-November/ 
005704.html
Jeremy did reply to a some questions Priscilla had put to the list  
about timezones - mainly how do we figure out a user's default  
timezone. We just use the timezone that the computer is set to.

The other discussion in the Cosmo Login-related workflows update  
thread about the admin and file browser UIs continued. As of now  
there is still disagreement about where to put this link and we will  
be working towards a resolution ASAP.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2006-November/ 
005726.html


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/attachments/20061127/1b26307b/attachment.html


More information about the Design mailing list