[Design] [Cosmo] Magic URL visual design review
Mimi Yin
mimi at osafoundation.org
Wed Nov 22 17:34:23 PST 2006
See in-line...
On Nov 22, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Matthew Eernisse wrote:
> If we want to say that localizing Cosmo for a specific language
> also requires special graphics tools like Photoshop/GIMP, that's a
> significant departure from the approach we've taken so far. I'm not
> saying it's the wrong approach, but it does raise the bar for
> participation, and as an open-source project, it something we
> should consider carefully I think.
The truth is with content like this, whoever does the translation is
going to have to have design skills, or work with someone who does.
Even the simplified version I mocked up will fail when it gets
translated into Finnish and most UIs don't look so hot when they get
localized into ideographic languages like Chinese. I don't think
we'll ever get to 100% with localization issues.
>> Mimi, Stick with you guns and go with the most visually appealing
>> proposal. At least that's my vote (if I may even do so)
Thanks Jeremy. At this point, I'm not particularly attached to either
design. we should pick whichever one gets us to Preview first :) All
things being equal, I would pick the 2nd one because it allows us to
have the collection name in the 'Add xxx to your account' text.
Mimi
More information about the Design
mailing list