[Design] [Cosmo] Login-related workflows update

Mimi Yin mimi at osafoundation.org
Wed Nov 22 11:22:36 PST 2006


Ah ic. Yup these are reasonable assumptions. We can certainly do this  
for admins. But how will we tell the difference between file-sharing  
users versus Casual Collaborator users?

On Nov 21, 2006, at 3:43 PM, Matthew Eernisse wrote:

> See inline, below.
>
> Mimi Yin wrote:
>> By dropdown menus, do you mean the File/Edit menus? I wasn't aware  
>> that we were doing that.
>
> Maybe not File/Edit, since those are sitting in the browser window  
> already, but a menubar and menus with similar behavior/functionality.
>
> I had just assumed if the endpoint is feature parity with Chandler,  
> eventually we'll have enough pieces of functionality that we'll  
> need to implement menus. It's a pretty low-cost piece of UI to  
> build, and if we can solve some other issues by building it sooner  
> rather than later, I think it's something worth thinking about.
>
>>> This also applies to the idea of asking people to choose which UI  
>>> they want before they log in seems kind of clunky and  
>>> unnecessarily complicated. Why not just add/remove items in a  
>>> drop-down menu?
>> I think I'm not following 'add/remove' items in a drop-down menu.  
>> Could you elaborate on that more? By items, do you mean shared  
>> collections? Or do you mean, add and remove views from view  
>> selector widget.
>
> Ah, sorry for not explaining myself very clearly there. I mean  
> adding some admin-specific items into the menu for users logged in  
> with admin accounts, and removing those items for ordinary users.  
> So admin-level users would have items available in their menus that  
> give them access to the special admin sections of the app.
>
> Hope that is clearer.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Matthew
>
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design



More information about the Design mailing list