[Design] Options for Invitation workflow in 0.7
Mimi Yin
mimi at osafoundation.org
Wed Jan 25 09:10:01 PST 2006
Could we implement subsequent Update/Notifications of an event item
simply as email text? (ie. what happens today if you stamp an event
as an email and hit Send). That way, we get a "complete" workflow,
even if the entire workflow isn't interoperable. Here's the scenario:
+ A (Chandler user) sends invitations to B (Chandler user) and C
(Outlook user) [iMIP request]
+ B edits and updates the event and sends it out as an email to A and C
+ A and C have to go manually update their invitations with B's
updates OR
+ A and B are sharing the event through a shared calendar, therefore
A doesn't have to manually update their invitation
Mimi
On Jan 24, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> Note that I'm consciously proposing a system and a workflow that is
> not "complete". It would provide the ability for an organizer to
> send an invitation that would be reasonably well received by any
> email client, not just Chandler. It would provide the ability for
> an attendee to indicate their attendance, yes/no. But I suspect we
> won't quickly get to the point of successfully handling other steps
> -- perhaps reschedules are a little fuzzy, the ability of a
> recipient to do a major update and automatically Notify others (see
> Mimi's concept of an explicit conscious Notification) would be
> interop-impaired, if even possible... Anyway, I'm proposing some
> first steps and not addressing all steps.
More information about the Design
mailing list