[Design] [D/f]How do I group events?
Mimi Yin
mimi at osafoundation.org
Tue Jan 24 12:47:55 PST 2006
I think the likelihood of one item appearing in multiple collections
differs depending on the domain. As just a pure Calendar app: rare
but not impossible (ie. An office event I am attending, so the item
lives on both the office calendar and my own calendar.)
As an integrated information manager, you can easily imagine users
creating all kinds of collections:
+ that are more than just (different calendars)
+ that are defined along "orthogonal" attributes: (ie. Project
collections and @People agenda lists)
In this world, the likelihood of a single item appearing in multiple
collections is very high.
Mimi
On Jan 24, 2006, at 7:42 AM, Reid Ellis wrote:
> On Mon Jan 23 2006, at 20:36, Jeffrey Harris wrote:
>> Hi Mimi,
>>
>>> iCal gets around this by shipping out of the box with 2
>>> calendars: Home
>>> and Work + they have a big fat [+] button at the bottom of the
>>> sidebar.
>>>
>>> It is also possible that as Chandler becomes more of a "cross-
>>> app" app,
>>> the idea of creating "top-down" collections of items as a generic
>>> way to
>>> group items will neutralize the "set a category" mental model people
>>> bring from other calendaring apps.
>>
>> Yeah, this will hopefully happen eventually, but why not add a big
>> fat
>> plus of our own? I'd be supportive of that, anyway.
>>
>> I suppose one worry is that people are used to the hierarchical
>> model of
>> items, it won't occur to them that add-to-collection isn't going to
>> move-my-item-out-of-this-collection. Making a big fat plus isn't
>> going
>> to solve that problem.
>>
> This is reminiscent of the drag-to-copy vs drag-to-move debates of
> ages gone by. However, in this case, an item may belong to several
> collections, so moving out of a collection (or all collections) is
> not an expected/clear behaviour, is it?
>
> Are we expecting that users will have items in multiple collections
> as a matter of course? Or will it be less common than the one-
> collection item? If one-collection items prevail, moving items to
> other collections should behave as they do in iCal, where they
> would be removed from the previous collection.
>
> Maybe I need to read more design notes on the Wiki about this..
>
> Reid
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
More information about the Design
mailing list