[Design] [Proposal] Recurring events in Cosmo
Mimi Yin
mimi at osafoundation.org
Wed Apr 19 08:32:12 PDT 2006
Can we hide the end-date and behind the scenes generate more
occurrences on the fly *if and when* the user browses ahead in the
calendar?
Perhaps we don't need to worry about editing the end-date for the
TargetUser Release, since we're not supporting full editing anyway?
But I agree with Priss that a 1 year end-date would be worrisome to
users...and wouldn't make much sense for annual events either.
Mimi
On Apr 18, 2006, at 2:53 PM, Priscilla Chung wrote:
> Yes I understood about the temporary work around. I agree setting a
> default end date should be ok for 0.2. Just to be clear, this
> restriction should not be in place for the target user release.
>> * In Chandler and/or Scooby, just make the "recurrence end date"
>> UI element default to one year in the future. If the user wants to
>> change it, they can.
> What happens when a user deletes the end date? Would the user not
> be able to submit the event? Personally one should be able to
> delete the end date as certain events just don't have end dates,
> ie. birthdays.
>> No hidden anything, no changes to Cosmo, just a temporary
>> workaround until the Cosmo issue is sorted, which it might be soon
>> anyway.
> To BCM's point, the best thing may be to do nothing in code, until
> the bug is investigated. In the meantime we document the bug and
> and document the work around, ie. to add an end date to recurring
> events.
>
> -Priscilla
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
More information about the Design
mailing list