[Design] [Proposal] Recurring events in Cosmo

[Priscilla Chung]

Yes I understood about the temporary work around. I agree setting a 
default end date should be ok for 0.2. Just to be clear, this 
restriction should not be in place for the target user release.
> * In Chandler and/or Scooby, just make the "recurrence end date" UI 
> element default to one year in the future. If the user wants to change 
> it, they can.  
What happens when a user deletes the end date? Would the user not be 
able to submit the event? Personally one should be able to delete the 
end date as certain events just don't have end dates, ie. birthdays.
> No hidden anything, no changes to Cosmo, just a temporary workaround 
> until the Cosmo issue is sorted, which it might be soon anyway.
To BCM's point, the best thing may be to do nothing in code, until the 
bug is investigated. In the meantime we document the bug and and 
document the work around, ie. to add an end date to recurring events.

-Priscilla
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/attachments/20060418/08699a17/attachment.htm