[Design] Restore and Free/Busy

[Mimi Yin]

Hmmm, I wonder if this can be consolidated with the Manage share menu 
item that lets you Manage the selected shared collection in the 
sidebar.

I think we need to do a re-haul of the menus for 0.7 and make a 
little bit of progress towards our unified Data In/Out story as well. 
This scenario is definitely part of that whole set of UI issues.

Mimi

>>>- what "not restoring" free/busy means? Now if I choose not to 
>>>restore the ifb, what is this ifb supposed to be? Can others still 
>>>subscribe to it? what does it mean to do that? As a user, what I'd 
>>>like to do if I'm not restoring something is to delete it so that 
>>>no one takes those info into account anymore. Having an option to 
>>>delete a share right here and there in the Restore dialog would be 
>>>extremely useful (for Cosmo folks, I know you can do that through 
>>>the Cosmo web UI but I'm talking about doing this from Chandler)
>>
>>Deleting shares on the server would be very useful. I find I have a 
>>lot of extra published collections on the server from various 
>>attempts to share the same collection.
>Ditto here. I propose that we rename "Restore published shares..." 
>to "Manage published shares..." and add the relevant buttons to 
>cover the management operations: restore, delete...
>
>Cheers,
>- Philippe