[Design] [Last call] Bug 5403: Re-importing/Re-subscribing to a Trashed item

[Mimi Yin]

Morgen, do you have any issues with going with this proposal? We  
would want the behavior to be consistent for both re-Subscribe and re- 
Import.

Please see original write-up for more background: http:// 
lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2006-March/004358.html

On Mar 15, 2006, at 5:10 PM, Jeffrey Harris wrote:

> Hi Mimi,
>
>> So I think the right thing to do is to have the Import and Subscribe
>> behave in accordance with Jeffrey's A proposal, which corresponds to
>> Proposal #2 above: Remove the item from the Trash, but don't  
>> restore it
>> to all the collections it used to be a member of.
>>
>> And stick with the B proposal, which corresponds to Proposal #3  
>> above:
>> Remove the item from the Trash and restore it to all the  
>> collections it
>> used to be a member of, for when users explicitly remove an item from
>> the Trash or undo Trashing an item.
>
> Seems reasonable to me.  It does mean a bit more work for the sharing
> layer, though.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jeffrey
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design