[Design] when i dream of the perfect e-mail client ...Michael Toy Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:54:09 -0800
i've been away from computing for a while, so as i dive back in, things look a little different. i wonder if there hasn't been an over fascination with widgetry that we need to transcend. it reinforces a view of humans as button pushers, and that seems de-humanizing to me. i started by wondering if you could have a useful mail ui without any widgets, and as i mused on that, the deeper wishes started to come out. what i think i want is the ability for my e-mail reading experience to be more like sitting in a funky cafe reading the free newspaper than it is like working on a corporate finance spreadsheet. what if the feel of the environment for processing e-mail was as important as the ability for you to be able to quickly find the features of the e-mail client, sort of a holistic approach to ui design? it might be cool for music to start playing and for the rest of the screen to change when i started processing my e-mail. what if chandler's contribution to e-mail was the introduction of beauty into user interface? maybe you would bring in whole new waves of people who have been avoiding e-mail because the space was so ugly? i ran across this interesting reference ... http://www.edwardtufte.com/920199304/bboard/q-and-a-fetch- msg?msg_id=0000KK&topic_id=1&topic=Ask%20E%2eT%2e ... to the idea that "human mind has evolved to identify useful data and that the sensation of beauty is a response to especially relevant information" which made me wonder if you could design a ui without reference to anything but beauty, and count on the intuitive power of that quest to deliver something which is useful. along these lines, last night i was having a fun discussion with some friends, one was a painter and one was a graphic designer. the graphic designer was talking about how much he enjoyed using a level, because it helped him to hang shelves in his house that were perfectly parallel. the first temptation would be to label him as anal retentive, but as we talked more it came out the his perception of beauty was strongly tied to straight lines and hard corners. the painter, meanwhile, was very different, prefering things which were more organic, curves, broken edges, things like that. this brings forward the idea that beauty is very personal, and that one interface could be perceived many ways. maybe there is a small set of "environments" that could be crafted, to appeal to various classes of people michael's funky cafe mitch's speadsheet the organized soccer mom's neat todo lists ... comments? -- michael toy (development manager, osaf) unrealistic dreamer will think randomly for food
|