[Design] notification: little iconspetite_abeille Thu, 5 Dec 2002 21:47:19 +0100
On Wednesday, Dec 4, 2002, at 23:27 Europe/Zurich, Kaitlin Duck Sherwood wrote: > Or I could have a different icon for each of my groups: bosses, > immediate colleagues, others at my company, family, friends, skydiving > team, mailing lists, etc. and each group has an icon whose border > changes color. (I'd want my mailing list icon's colors to change less > rapidly than my boss'.) This all sounds very funky, but I don't think goes far enough: mostly static icons are a waste of time. On the other hand, providing much richer visual feedback is something worth investigating. For example, email client traditionally represents a message with a little envelope... Always the same envelope... Over and over again... What about using that little "icon" to convey more information about its underlying data: make it thicker if its a "large" message, dusty if it's an old one. Put an "urgent" stamp on it if it's, well, urgent. Turn it into a parcel if it has attachments. And so on, and so forth. There is a lot of visual feedback that one could convey in a small icon. This would give some information "depth" to those pictograms, instead of just wasting screen real estate. In fact such an approach could be extended to all icons. A folder: make it slim, covered with spider nets and feeding to show that you never look at it (aka information decay). Document icons? Same deal as for messages. And so on. A lot to be done in this area... In any case, if todays computer can run Quake, they should be able to provide richer -information wise- icons to. PA.
|