[Cosmo-dev] [Sum] Oct 7-13
Ted Leung
twl at osafoundation.org
Mon Oct 15 17:39:15 PDT 2007
Here's the summary of the activity on cosmo-dev for the week of
October 7, 2007.
New threads:
-------
Brian Moseley noticed that the trunk was set to be Cosmo 0.8.1 and
proposed that the trunk be kept at the major version number, not the
bugfix release version number. People agreed with this.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004899.html>
Ted Leung asked what the frequency of Cosmo releases should be and
proposed 2 weeks. There was a significant amount of discussion
about this. In particular, the QA folks felt that a two week cycle
might be difficult to maintain, and many of the developers preferred
a 4 week cycle. After some clarification of requirements, there was
some additional discussion and out of the box thinking. This lead
to Brian Moseley and Randy Letness going off to try and modularize
Cosmo into subprojects so that different parts of the system could
rev at different rates more easily. In the interim, it seemed like
people were willing to try two week cycles, as long as there was
recognition that other process changes might be required.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004905.html>
Jared Rhine forwarded a problem report from an Opera user who was
having trouble signing up for an account.
+ The problem turns out to be in Opera's inclusion of a Content-
Transfer-Encoding header in the request. The fix is to ignore and
log the header and proceed
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004921.html>
Mikeal Rogers sent a reminder of bugzilla process for bugs that get
fixed before the bug council has a chance to look at them. This is
important because the QA team looks at bugs in particular milestones,
so bugs that get resolved in --- milestones never get verified by QA.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004935.html>
Brian Moselely posted that he was starting to do some thinking about
scheduling, particularly the impact on the backend.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004939.html>
Travis Vachon reported the results of his investigations of the Git
distributed version control system.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004942.html>
Jared Rhine filed a bug to drop the 443 in webcal URLs - Cosmo
already drops the https because iCal 2.x can't do https.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004947.html>
Adam Christian reported performance problems on qacosmo after running
the 0.8 migration scripts.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004956.html>
Brian Moseley described his plans for splitting Cosmo into subprojects
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004960.html>
Mikeal Rogers checked in some enhancements to the protocol level
tests for Cosmo including the ability to pass the url and path of the
server being tested.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004963.html>
Ted Leung making the bug council even more asynchronous by moving
more of the work to e-mail, but a number of people felt that this
would be a bad move, so the proposal was dropped.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004972.html>
Ted Leung moved bugs from the Cosmo 1.0 milestone to the Cosmo 0.9
milestone.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004973.html>
Heikki Toivonen crossposted to the Cosmo list on the topic of
handling the version numbers of Chandler Desktop and Chandler Server
on the chandlerproject.org homepage. The rest of the discussion
played out on chandler-dev
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004974.html>
Ted Leung reported that a user found a brown paper bag bug in Cosmo
0.7.4, so a Cosmo 0.7.5 was going to be needed.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004982.html>
Ted Leung reported that Cosmo 0.7.5 would also force a respin of
Cosmo 0.8RC1. A few additional bug fixes would also go into Cosmo
0.8RC2
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004982.html>
Ted Leung raised some questions about bug 11010 which involved
syncing collection name changes. Because some of the questions were
over whether the bug was desktop or server side or both, the
discussion ended up moving to the design list.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004989.html>
Brian Moseley commented on the commit for r5911/bug 11019, because it
would mean not updating the displayName, which would mean that Cosmo
could not figure out which collection was referenced by a
hierarchical DAV url
+ Randy Letness replied that there were situations (a DAV client does
a put, followed by Chandler Desktop changing the item name) where
URI's could become invalide
+ Brian Mosely replied that this would be a problem for bug 9145
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004991.html>
Jared Rhine asked for an explanation of the error codes generated
during the signup process. He got no response.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004996.html>
Aparna Kadakia proposed a series of QA process changes with the goal
of eliminating as much manual testing as possible.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004997.html>
Continuing Conversations:
-------
The discussion on re-sharing read-only collections continued. Morgen
Sagen suggested that the server prevent an item being copied from one
collection to another unless the user has read/write permission on
the item - this being determined by the user having at least one read-
write ticket for any collection containing that item.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004958.html>
There were additional comments on the question of short variable
names, and refactorings packed in the same commits as bug fixes.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004901.html>
Meetings, Announcements:
-------
Adam Christian reported that Cosmo 0.7.4RC3 had passed QA
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004950.html>
Mike Taylor (Bear) announced the availability of the Cosmo 0.7.4 build
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004952.html>
Ted Leung announced the availability of Cosmo 0.7.4
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004959.html>
Mike Taylor (Bear) announced the availability of Cosmo 0.7.5.RC1
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-October/
004995.html>
More information about the cosmo-dev
mailing list