[Cosmo-dev] Cosmo release frequency

[Ted Leung]

Not so fast -- I'm not looking to shove 2 week cycles down anyone's  
throat here.  I wanted to make sure that we are all working off the  
same information, and understand what the problem space looks like.    
I'm perfectly willing to explore radical alternatives like breaking  
up the code base into pieces that release on different cycles.

Let's have some more discussion around things that we could do.

On Oct 8, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Brian Moseley wrote:

> On 10/8/07, Ted Leung <twl at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> 4. I'm not sure I understand the stress level argument.   With the
>> time based releases, we are not asking people to promise to deliver a
>> feature by a specific release.   When the feature is done and
>> suitably tested, it goes in the next release - we neither push
>> forward or push back release dates based on the completeness of
>> features.
>
> managing all of those branches is sure going to be stressful. but
> fine. if you want to try two week cycles, i'll play along. we will
> definitely find out where our processes will break.
> _______________________________________________
> cosmo-dev mailing list
> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev