[cosmo-dev] Cosmo .10 testing status
Mike Taylor
bear at code-bear.com
Tue Nov 27 15:55:44 PST 2007
On Nov 27, 2007, at 4:53 PM, Mikeal Rogers wrote:
>>> I think adam uses a version of Windmill that is custom or hasn't
>>> been pushed as a release - the tinderboxes are running now for two
>>> browsers and showing test failures. I upgrade them when I get
>>> notified of new windmill versions and right now that is when I see
>>> the announcement either on the windmill list or via cheeseshop.
>
> Our policy _should_ be to have the tests in the cosmo/test/
> functional/windmill be supported by the latest release of windmill.
> Tests should not be checked in to the cosmo repo that depend on pre-
> release windmill code.
>
> From now on let's assume that any failures of latest release
> windmill testing the latest tests in the cosmo repo are valid
> failures and refrain from checking in any tests that rely on pre-
> release code. It's very easy to push a windmill bugfix release to
> the cheeseshop and announce so the *release* bit shouldn't be a
> bottleneck for anyone. If the issue is that we're writing tests that
> rely on code that doesn't work in windmill yet then we shouldn't be
> checking those tests in to the cosmo repository.
>
> Bear, would you like a feed or something more automated to notify
> you when windmill updates release? I know the windmill blog has a
> feed but we could stick up something smarter if you like.
A best-of-all-worlds solution would be if something could auto-post a
bug using the email feature - but I know thats reaching for the stars.
I track the windmill dev list so if all releases are announced there,
that will work.
--
bear
Build and Release Engineer
Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
bear at osafoundation.org
http://www.osafoundation.org
bear at code-bear.com
http://code-bear.com
More information about the cosmo-dev
mailing list