[cosmo-dev] 0.9.0 update

[Ted Leung]

I am following developments by reading the #cosmo logs -- I just did  
a quick test of hub, and it seems to be going reasonably fast - with  
2 overlays (one being the office calendar) wk-to-wk time is about 4sec.

On Nov 14, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Ted Leung wrote:

> On Nov 14, 2007, at 10:16 AM, Jared Rhine wrote:
>
>> A recap of our 0.9.0 status.
>>
>> We have a final build of 0.9.0.  It has not been announced to  
>> lists and the blog.
>>
>> We discovered there was a significant performance regression for  
>> some operations with Cosmo 0.9.0, to the point that we rolled-back  
>> the Hub.
>>
>> How should we set priorities, in particular with Ted mostly  
>> unavailable this week?
>
> My cell phone# is on the internal wiki - you should not hesitate to  
> use it...
>
>>
>> Most devs are already into a high-urgency performance-review phase.
>>
>> I suggest the following for priorities:
>>
>> * Leave the tarball and tag in place; it's not really hurting  
>> anyone right now.  Assume we're doing a 0.9.1 release fixing this  
>> specific issue; today if it works out.
>
> We have in the past had people grab tarballs without a public  
> announcement.   Pulling the tarballs and just doing 0.9.1 is an  
> option.
>
>>
>> * Do a all-hands-on-deck sort of thing for characterizing and  
>> fixing the performance regression with /atom requests.  Defer any  
>> other specific milestone, like 0.10 branching/code-complete until  
>> we have a grip on this situation and probably an updated 0.9  
>> pushed to Hub.  Fixes from this work go into 0.9 branch.
>
> +1
>
>>
>> * Tell Travis to go ahead with putting-the-A-back-in-Ajax work to  
>> make our XHR calls not block.  That work can go into 0.9 branch if  
>> it's completed early.
>
> I'd prefer to fix one problem at a time.   This is something that I  
> think we want to test more carefully -- I'd prefer to see this go  
> into 0.10
>
>>
>> * Developers not tied up in the above continue work on 0.10  
>> updates to trunk.
>
> +1
>
> Ted
> _______________________________________________
> cosmo-dev mailing list
> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev