[cosmo-dev] Cosmo Releases Status

Mikeal Rogers mikeal.rogers at gmail.com
Thu Nov 1 17:52:41 PDT 2007


Since we haven't built a release candidate for 0.9 yet I really don't  
see the problem in fixing bugs for that release rather then backing  
out features.

-Mikeal

On Nov 1, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Ted Leung wrote:

> Here's an update on the status of the Cosmo releases:
>
> * Due to a bad bug with dates and a fix for the iCal3 collection  
> with spaces in the name problem, we've done a Cosmo 0.8.2
>
> * Initial testing has uncovered some severe bugs in Cosmo 0.9.  
> Probably the most severe of these is bug 11213 <https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11213 
> >, which makes overlays unusable.   In theory, we should have two  
> choices:
>
> 1) back out the overlay feature and put it into 0.10
> 2) fix bug 11213
>
> Unfortunately, Matthew is at the FLOSS Usability Sprint through the  
> weekend so he won't have a lot of time to look at this bug, or to  
> work on backing out all the overlay related changes.  So unless we  
> can figure out how to back out overlays, I think we are going to  
> have to wait until 11213 can be fixed.
>
> * In the meantime people have been working on 0.10.   I'd like to  
> propose that people stop working on bugs/features for 0.10 at the  
> end of the day, Friday, Nov 2, and then spend the next week beefing  
> up test cases - especially in the UI, but really all over the  
> system, and that we then send 0.10 to QA on Friday, Nov 9.   The  
> only exception I would make is for fixes to improve our  
> compatibility with iCal3, which should be a high priority for us  
> right now.
>
> Ted
> _______________________________________________
> cosmo-dev mailing list
> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev



More information about the cosmo-dev mailing list