[Cosmo-dev] Draft: e-mail announcement for 0.6.1

[Pieter Hartsook]

+1, to make the launch "official"

On 5/14/07, Mikeal Rogers <mikeal at osafoundation.org> wrote:
> I agree completely except for I think that the later email to
> announce and chandler-users should _also_ be send to cosmo-dev.
>
> -Mikeal
>
> On May 14, 2007, at 6:57 PM, Pieter Hartsook wrote:
>
> > I agree with Jared. The cosmo-dev post IMHO is just for the cosmo
> > developer community who may want to know the new release is available
> > and where to get it, and are not  too concerned with the niceties of
> > the website release notes, hosted service availability, etc.
> >
> > I think it would be better if the announce and chandler-users
> > maillists, and the blog post could wait until the
> > hub.chandlerproject.org gets QA validation, and the
> > cosmo.osafoundation.org website is updated so the announcement content
> > can point to those.
> >
> > Pieter
> >
> > BTW, I guess the cat is out of the bag as far as notifying the
> > cosmo-dev list ;-)
> >
> > On 5/14/07, Jared Rhine <jared at wordzoo.com> wrote:
> >> Priscilla Chung wrote:
> >> > Here is a first draft of the 0.6.1 e-mail announcement.
> >>
> >> Every product announcement needs at least one line saying what Cosmo
> >> (Chandler Server) is: "Chandler Server is a ....".  The one-line
> >> elevator pitch.
> >>
> >> I believe the Cosmo announcement should go out separately and
> >> independently from any service announcement.
> >>
> >> -- Jared
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cosmo-dev mailing list
> >> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
> >> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cosmo-dev mailing list
> > cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
> > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev
>
>
>