[Cosmo-dev] Re: changing the format of modification recurrence-ids in eim

[Randy Letness]

Brian Moseley wrote:
> On 5/8/07, Ted Leung <twl at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> If it requires changes to Cosmo, are we going to get into a nasty
>> situation with upgrades of the desktop?   When we release 0.6.1, we
>> are going to tell desktop dogfooders to use checkpoint  <fill in the
>> right checkpoint here>.   So if Cosmo changes in 0.7, those people
>> are going to have to upgrade in order to keep working against Cosmo
>> 0.7, right?  Or am I confused?
>
> no, you're right. the alternative is to make the change before the
> next rc, which i'm in favor of.

Yeah I'd like to get this into 0.6.1 if possible.

-Randy