[Cosmo-dev] Re: changing the format of modification recurrence-ids in eim

[Brian Moseley]

On 5/8/07, Ted Leung <twl at osafoundation.org> wrote:

> If it requires changes to Cosmo, are we going to get into a nasty
> situation with upgrades of the desktop?   When we release 0.6.1, we
> are going to tell desktop dogfooders to use checkpoint  <fill in the
> right checkpoint here>.   So if Cosmo changes in 0.7, those people
> are going to have to upgrade in order to keep working against Cosmo
> 0.7, right?  Or am I confused?

no, you're right. the alternative is to make the change before the
next rc, which i'm in favor of.