[Cosmo-dev] Re: changing the format of modification recurrence-ids in eim

[Ted Leung]

On May 8, 2007, at 5:32 PM, Brian Moseley wrote:

> On 5/8/07, Jeffrey Harris <jeffrey at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> I'm a little confused how this could require no change to Cosmo,  
>> seems
>> like if someone PUTs an iCalendar file with a recurring event and a
>> modification in a Cosmo collection, Cosmo has to decide which
>> pseudo-uuid to use for the modification if a Chandler client comes  
>> along
>> and queries that collection using Morse Code.
>
> that is true.

If it requires changes to Cosmo, are we going to get into a nasty  
situation with upgrades of the desktop?   When we release 0.6.1, we  
are going to tell desktop dogfooders to use checkpoint  <fill in the  
right checkpoint here>.   So if Cosmo changes in 0.7, those people  
are going to have to upgrade in order to keep working against Cosmo  
0.7, right?  Or am I confused?

Ted