[Cosmo-dev] Draft: Release note for 0.6.1

[Pieter Hartsook]

On 5/8/07, Priscilla Chung <priscilla at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On May 8, 2007, at 2:04 PM, Ted Leung wrote:
>
>
> It's not necessary to include the 0.7 open bugs at the bottom.  What would
> be useful is a link to the release notes for the previous version (Cosmo
> 0.6).I thought at some point all the 0.6.1 bugs are moved to 0.7? I just
> have those links available for Pieter if he needs to list the known bugs.
>
> I added the 0.6 release notes link at the bottom.
>
>
> Also I am not sure that we need the links at the bottom to the Chandler
> Sharing and EIM projects.  If we are going keep them, the accompanying text
> should be more clear that those are the Chandler side of the new sharing
> stuff.  Otherwise from just the text it looks like the same information is
> there twice.I wasn't sure how to frame the links or if there were other
> links I'm missing. Pieter I lean to you if you think they are valid to
> display, or just go ahead and ignore them. If you think they are valid, then
> I'll make a pass at a better description for the links if you want.
>

Since I like having the links to more info about the new formats I'll
take a crack at some introductory language.


>
> Minor nit - I think that we should stop adding Cosmo or Chandler Team to
> these.  It feels too corporate and exclusive. Funny, I feel the opposite,
> unless it's signed by a VP of something or another w/ a image of a
> signature. No worries I just left it blank for now. It was left over from
> when I copied the release  announcement way back when. Do you feel there
> needs a signature at all or just leave is blank?


The Release Notes can be presented without a signature line, but the
blog post and emails announcing the launch should be personal and
posted by a real person (on behalf of the dev team.)

>
> -Priscilla
>