[Cosmo-dev] Draft: Release note for 0.6.1

[Priscilla Chung]

On May 8, 2007, at 2:04 PM, Ted Leung wrote:

> It's not necessary to include the 0.7 open bugs at the bottom.   
> What would be useful is a link to the release notes for the  
> previous version (Cosmo 0.6).
I thought at some point all the 0.6.1 bugs are moved to 0.7? I just  
have those links available for Pieter if he needs to list the known  
bugs.

I added the 0.6 release notes link at the bottom.

>
> Also I am not sure that we need the links at the bottom to the  
> Chandler Sharing and EIM projects.  If we are going keep them, the  
> accompanying text should be more clear that those are the Chandler  
> side of the new sharing stuff.  Otherwise from just the text it  
> looks like the same information is there twice.
I wasn't sure how to frame the links or if there were other links I'm  
missing. Pieter I lean to you if you think they are valid to display,  
or just go ahead and ignore them. If you think they are valid, then  
I'll make a pass at a better description for the links if you want.

>
> Minor nit - I think that we should stop adding Cosmo or Chandler  
> Team to these.  It feels too corporate and exclusive.
Funny, I feel the opposite, unless it's signed by a VP of something  
or another w/ a image of a signature. No worries I just left it blank  
for now. It was left over from when I copied the release   
announcement way back when. Do you feel there needs a signature at  
all or just leave is blank?

-Priscilla

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/attachments/20070508/ab2774f6/attachment.html