[Cosmo-dev] [Proposal] Use Windmill for JS Unit testing

[Bobby Rullo]

Please just keep in mind that making sure the tests run without  
windmill is a requirement.



On Mar 31, 2007, at 2:13 AM, Mikeal Rogers wrote:

>>> If we can find a way to dynamically replace the regular jsunit  
>>> assertion methods with our own I think we can do this all pretty  
>>> easily.
>>>
>>
>> I still don't see the reason for this...Could you explain?
>
> Since windmill will be responsible for running tests and gathering  
> results we'll need to override the validation methods to call pass/ 
> fail in our own windmill jsunit test framework. I'm sure we could  
> find a way to hook into the jsunit module and gather the results  
> after running, but bending everything to run in windmill will be  
> more difficult than just replacing the validation functions  
> dynamically.
>
>> Well js is one of them thar dynamical language things, so it ought  
>> to be possible.  Should I reassign the jsunit related bug(s) to  
>> you or to Adam?
>
> Adam should get any javascript bugs, the result reports will be  
> sent back to the windmill server over jsonrpc and at some point  
> I'll be responsible for printing and logging them, but for the most  
> part this is Adam's works and all bugs should be assigned to him.
>
> -Mikeal
>
>