[Cosmo-dev] [Proposal] Use Windmill for JS Unit testing

[Mikeal Rogers]

>> If we can find a way to dynamically replace the regular jsunit  
>> assertion methods with our own I think we can do this all pretty  
>> easily.
>>
>
> I still don't see the reason for this...Could you explain?

Since windmill will be responsible for running tests and gathering  
results we'll need to override the validation methods to call pass/ 
fail in our own windmill jsunit test framework. I'm sure we could  
find a way to hook into the jsunit module and gather the results  
after running, but bending everything to run in windmill will be more  
difficult than just replacing the validation functions dynamically.

> Well js is one of them thar dynamical language things, so it ought  
> to be possible.  Should I reassign the jsunit related bug(s) to you  
> or to Adam?

Adam should get any javascript bugs, the result reports will be sent  
back to the windmill server over jsonrpc and at some point I'll be  
responsible for printing and logging them, but for the most part this  
is Adam's works and all bugs should be assigned to him.

-Mikeal


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/attachments/20070331/4d4480c9/PGP.pgp