[Cosmo-dev] Problems subscribing to the Office Calendar
Randy Letness
randy at osafoundation.org
Wed Mar 7 19:06:55 PST 2007
Ted Leung wrote:
> 1. Is iCal4J really the problem? If so, what is the right fix (asking
> for a fix upstream, patching ourselves, patching Cosmo code)?
There are a couple ways of fixing this. We can fix the ical4j code, or
we can fix it in Cosmo code (should be a one-line fix). I would suggest
fixing in our code as its quick and easy and we are in the middle of
moving away from using custom ical4j code. I've already submitted an
ical4j bug so hopefully it gets fixed soon and we don't have to worry
about this in 0.6.1. (I can also submit a patch).
> 2. Is the problem severe enough to warrant a Cosmo 0.6.0.1 release and
> accompanying osaf.us upgrade?
If we don't fix the problem, we will continue to see corrupted events.
I think it needs to be fixed to prevent further corruption.
> 3. If 2 is correct, how much QA will we need to do and does QA have
> the bandwidth to do so?
>
QA should be minimal, just verifying basic functionality.
-Randy
More information about the cosmo-dev
mailing list