[Cosmo-dev] cosmo 0.6.1 EIMML changes
morgen at osafoundation.org
Mon Mar 5 13:08:49 PST 2007
On Mar 5, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Brian Moseley wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Randy Letness <randy at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>> Just so we are clear: If we have a "noteModificaiton" record
>> type, its
>> seems like we need everything in the "item" and "note" record types
>> (plus recurrenceId and parentUuid) because a note modification can
>> a its own triageStatus, lastModifiedBy, displayName, etc.
> isn't this why were just going to add an optional parentUuid field to
> the existing item and note records, to allow them to represent
> modifications as well as regular items? or did i just make that up?
Hmm, if those fields are optional, then they couldn't be keys, so I
don't think that would work unless I'm mistaken.
More information about the cosmo-dev