[Cosmo-dev] cosmo 0.6.1 EIMML changes

[Morgen Sagen]

On Mar 5, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Brian Moseley wrote:

> On 3/5/07, Randy Letness <randy at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> Just so we are clear:  If we have a "noteModificaiton" record  
>> type, its
>> seems like we need everything in the "item" and "note" record types
>> (plus recurrenceId and parentUuid) because a note modification can  
>> have
>> a its own triageStatus, lastModifiedBy, displayName, etc.
>
> isn't this why were just going to add an optional parentUuid field to
> the existing item and note records, to allow them to represent
> modifications as well as regular items? or did i just make that up?

Hmm, if those fields are optional, then they couldn't be keys, so I  
don't think that would work unless I'm mistaken.