[Cosmo-dev] cosmo 0.6.1 EIMML changes

[Brian Moseley]

On 3/5/07, Randy Letness <randy at osafoundation.org> wrote:

> Just so we are clear:  If we have a "noteModificaiton" record type, its
> seems like we need everything in the "item" and "note" record types
> (plus recurrenceId and parentUuid) because a note modification can have
> a its own triageStatus, lastModifiedBy, displayName, etc.

isn't this why were just going to add an optional parentUuid field to
the existing item and note records, to allow them to represent
modifications as well as regular items? or did i just make that up?