[Cosmo-dev] cosmo 0.6.1 EIMML changes

[Randy Letness]

Jeffrey Harris wrote:
>>> I don't think we're that far off.  Cosmo still has to represent a
>>> modification as a separate note item.  We just need to decide on the
>>> protocol.  I'm fine with defining a noteModification and
>>> eventModification  record  type that each have two key fields
>>> (parentUuid and recurrenceId).  Cosmo will assign a random uuid to
>>> modification items, but will use parentUuid and recurrenceId to to
>>> lookup existing items.
>>>       
>> I think that sounds good, but I'll wait for Jeffrey to give a definitive
>> answer.  :-)
>>     
>
> This sounds good to me, too.
>   
Just so we are clear:  If we have a "noteModificaiton" record type, its 
seems like we need everything in the "item" and "note" record types 
(plus recurrenceId and parentUuid) because a note modification can have 
a its own triageStatus, lastModifiedBy, displayName, etc.

-Randy