[Cosmo-dev] cosmo 0.6.1 EIMML changes

[Jeffrey Harris]

>> I don't think we're that far off.  Cosmo still has to represent a
>> modification as a separate note item.  We just need to decide on the
>> protocol.  I'm fine with defining a noteModification and
>> eventModification  record  type that each have two key fields
>> (parentUuid and recurrenceId).  Cosmo will assign a random uuid to
>> modification items, but will use parentUuid and recurrenceId to to
>> lookup existing items.
> 
> I think that sounds good, but I'll wait for Jeffrey to give a definitive
> answer.  :-)

This sounds good to me, too.

So, I think we've got a plan (this time written down and
understood/agreed to by both the Desktop and Server sides of things),
hooray!

Sincerely,
Jeffrey