[Cosmo-dev] cosmo 0.6.1 EIMML changes

[Brian Moseley]

On 3/1/07, Jeffrey Harris <jeffrey at osafoundation.org> wrote:

> Yeah, it's a pain to handle noteModifications differently from notes.
> Unfortunately, I think noteModification is fundamentally different from
> note (for one thing, it may having the recurrence-specific Missing
> value, unlike a normal note).  This is why I thought we'd just put the
> note fields in EventModification, since its fields are so closely
> connected to event processing.

does anybody else get the feeling that this whole data model is just a
little bit too complicated?