[Cosmo-dev] cosmo 0.6.1 EIMML changes

[Randy Letness]

Jeffrey Harris wrote:
> It seems OK to me to have a NoteModification record separate from
> EventModification, but I'm attached to not passing around UUIDs for
> modifications, so in your EventModification example, I think instead of
> eventModification:uuid we need eventModification:parentUuid, and in
> NoteModification we need to remove the uuid field and add a
> recurrence-id field.
>   

We can do this, but it's much easier for Cosmo if it has the uuid of the 
note modification because synchronizations and updates to the 
note/contentitem records on a note modification are processed in the 
exact same way as the master note item.  Otherwise we need a bunch of 
custom logic to handle note vs noteModification.

-Randy