[Cosmo-dev] cosmo 0.6.1 EIMML changes
randy at osafoundation.org
Thu Mar 1 11:03:02 PST 2007
Jeffrey Harris wrote:
> It seems OK to me to have a NoteModification record separate from
> EventModification, but I'm attached to not passing around UUIDs for
> modifications, so in your EventModification example, I think instead of
> eventModification:uuid we need eventModification:parentUuid, and in
> NoteModification we need to remove the uuid field and add a
> recurrence-id field.
We can do this, but it's much easier for Cosmo if it has the uuid of the
note modification because synchronizations and updates to the
note/contentitem records on a note modification are processed in the
exact same way as the master note item. Otherwise we need a bunch of
custom logic to handle note vs noteModification.
More information about the cosmo-dev