[Cosmo-dev] back-port Cosmo fix to 0.6.1?

[Aparna Kadakia]

I don't know what the final decision was on this proposal. If we are  
indeed doing a patch on production, I suggest we get it QA-ed and  
have it subsequently applied on qacosmo and qasharing.

On Jun 25, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Ted Leung wrote:

> Hi Jared and Aparna,
>
> Have we decided on whether we need to do a 0.6.1.1?
>
> Ted
>
> On Jun 21, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Aparna Kadakia wrote:
>
>> Either ways we should get the patch tested on qacosmo before we  
>> roll it out on production.
>>
>> On Jun 21, 2007, at 11:36 AM, Brian Moseley wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/20/07, Morgen Sagen <morgen at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>>>> Recently we discovered that the EIM field length restrictions for
>>>> EXDATE (and other ics related fields) were way too small -- they  
>>>> were
>>>> limited to 1024 characters which meant that any recurring event  
>>>> that
>>>> had more than about 60 exceptions would be rejected by Cosmo.   
>>>> Brian
>>>> has already bumped the limit up to 32K in the Cosmo trunk, but I
>>>> think we need this fix running on hub.chandlerproject.org because
>>>> Mitch and Esther are already bumping into the 1024 character limit.
>>>
>>> i don't see any technical reason why we can't spin a 0.6.1.1 with  
>>> this
>>> change or, alternatively, give jared a (very small) patch.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cosmo-dev mailing list
>>> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
>>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cosmo-dev mailing list
>> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> cosmo-dev mailing list
> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev