[Cosmo-dev] back-port Cosmo fix to 0.6.1?

[Ted Leung]

Hi Jared and Aparna,

Have we decided on whether we need to do a 0.6.1.1?

Ted

On Jun 21, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Aparna Kadakia wrote:

> Either ways we should get the patch tested on qacosmo before we  
> roll it out on production.
>
> On Jun 21, 2007, at 11:36 AM, Brian Moseley wrote:
>
>> On 6/20/07, Morgen Sagen <morgen at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>>> Recently we discovered that the EIM field length restrictions for
>>> EXDATE (and other ics related fields) were way too small -- they  
>>> were
>>> limited to 1024 characters which meant that any recurring event that
>>> had more than about 60 exceptions would be rejected by Cosmo.  Brian
>>> has already bumped the limit up to 32K in the Cosmo trunk, but I
>>> think we need this fix running on hub.chandlerproject.org because
>>> Mitch and Esther are already bumping into the 1024 character limit.
>>
>> i don't see any technical reason why we can't spin a 0.6.1.1 with  
>> this
>> change or, alternatively, give jared a (very small) patch.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cosmo-dev mailing list
>> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> cosmo-dev mailing list
> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev