[Cosmo-dev] Cosmo.next version numbering

[Travis Vachon]

9890 is fixed :-)

-Travis


On Jul 13, 2007, at 1:41 PM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:

> Ok, lets keep those in then. Any 2c on the Safari bugs?
>
> Cheers,
> Katie
>
> Matthew Eernisse wrote:
>> Katie,
>> I would like to propose keeping the following from that list:
>> Bug 9939 (Ubuntu logo)
>> This is not an Ubuntu problem -- it looks that way for everybody,  
>> and it's the first thing people downloading the bundle will see.  
>> Getting the right size graphic in there is trivial. I think we  
>> should fix this.
>> Bug 8130 (Detail view display when you switch collections)
>> This should be easy. Bobby has implemented 'no selection' in the  
>> detail view, so it should just be wiring it up to the collection  
>> switch.
>> Thanks.
>> Matthew
>> Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
>>> Putting on my cosmo-pm-pinch-hitter hat, I have a follow up  
>>> proposal:
>>>
>>> - Move Safari related bugs to 0.7.1: Bugs 9747, 9888, 9889, 9890
>>>
>>> - Other bugs to treat similarly (or outright move to Future):
>>>   + Bug 8130 (Detail view display when you switch collections)
>>>   + Bug 9818 (Users should be allowed to leave Title field blank)
>>>   + Bug 9899 (to/fr fields not displayed in the Updated By column)
>>>   + Bug 9939 (Ubuntu logo)
>>>   + Bug 9887 (small screen browser button layout)
>>>
>>> I know these cuts are getting painful; the spirit of the proposal  
>>> is to get something up on production and fix these bugs in quick  
>>> release cycles. I'm not 100% sure a Safari punt is the right  
>>> thing to do, but thought I'd throw it out there.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Katie
>>>
>>> Ted Leung wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> We've been saying that the next "feature" release of Cosmo was  
>>>> going to focus on interop of various kinds, and that the  
>>>> external forcing function for that release would be Apple's  
>>>> release of OS X Leopard sometime in October.   Currently we've  
>>>> been assigning the interop bugs to a 0.7.1 milestone, but in  
>>>> conversations with various folks, it seems like it would be  
>>>> better to create a Cosmo 0.8 milestone, and put all the bugs  
>>>> currently assigned to 0.7.1 there and leave the 0.7.x release  
>>>> numbers for an inevitable series of Cosmo 0.7 bug fix releases.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cosmo-dev mailing list
>>> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
>>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cosmo-dev mailing list
> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev