[Cosmo-dev] Re: Testing checkpoint for Cosmo 0.7

[Mikeal Rogers]

I would say all the current P1 bugs that are assigned to developers  
would need to be fixed before we would point dogfooders at qacosmo.

http://tinyurl.com/36d4vh

I think more frequent bug councils are a great idea.

Our current bug council is on Friday, should we do another one on  
Wednesday?

-Mikeal

On Jul 5, 2007, at 12:11 PM, Sheila Mooney wrote:

> Mikeal,
>
> I was supposed to get this email out earlier in the week. During  
> the Preview meeting on Monday we discussed crafting some kind of  
> milestone goal around getting to a version of Cosmo 0.7 that we  
> could point testers to. This is different from a dogfoodable  
> checkpoint, it really just means that we can have people testing  
> the round trip features between Cosmo and the Desktop. We are not  
> intending on updating hub.chandlerproject.org and would simply  
> point people to qacosmo understanding that data gets wiped and the  
> build gets updated frequently. We feel that identifying and getting  
> to this kind of a milestone will better help us take advantage of  
> additional testing resources.
>
> We could define this checkpoint as fixing the blockers that would  
> prevent a full manual test. It's my understanding that there are a  
> number of such bugs. If there are 2 many we could explore doing  
> this in stages ie: calendar vs dashboard. Probably the first step  
> is to get the list of problems and go from there.
>
> Questions for you...
>
> + Could you identify this list of blockers so we can have the  
> developers working on these.
> + We were going to propose more frequent bug councils ie: twice a  
> week and wanted to get your feedback on that.
>
> Thanks,
> Sheila
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/attachments/20070705/c9d5109d/attachment.htm