[Cosmo-dev] Cosmo end user bug triage

[Ted Leung]

I've finished my pass through Sheila's list, and I"ve now put the bug  
priorities into line with the list.   You should now be able to use  
the bug priorities to help you figure out what to do next.  Also,  
please take a moment and SWAG your P1 and P2 bugs -- you can put the  
SWAGs in the whiteboard status field in bugzilla, as we've done  
before.  Here's a breakdown on bugs by person: <http://tinyurl.com/ 
2cwssa>.

Thanks,

Ted

On Jul 2, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Ted Leung wrote:

> Ok,
>
> I"ve made a copy of Sheila's page, and augmented it with live  
> bugzilla query data, which will help me reprioritize the actual  
> bugs: <http://chandlerproject.org/Journal/TedLeung20070627>.   I'm  
> going to go through and adjust the bugzilla priorities to match  
> Sheila's buckets, and do a little additional tweaking.
>
> If you have an issue with the bucketization of one of you bugs,  
> please let us know by responding to this note.  Otherwise, be  
> prepared for a flood of bugmails.
>
> Ted
>
> On Jun 29, 2007, at 5:32 PM, Sheila Mooney wrote:
>
>> So, Mimi and I have started going through all the Cosmo bugs  
>> targeted for 0.7 to provide input on prioritization. We have gone  
>> through the P1, P2 and P3 bugs and bucketized them according to  
>> some end user prioritization buckets. I am passing this info off  
>> to Ted who will be making any changes to the prioritization.
>>
>> http://chandlerproject.org/Journal/CosmoBugTriage20070621
>>
>> A couple of notes....
>>
>> + We have ignored any dev/test/hub related bugs since we are not  
>> the right people to be prioritizing these items
>> + We have also excluded the rebranding tasks since we are going to  
>> P1 the logo work for now but ultimately all of these have to be  
>> done so we will be tracking them as part of the release checklist.
>> + We have not included the bugs we triaged during the bug council  
>> today - we can assume they are triaged appropriately
>> + Keep in mind that the PPD input is one of many we are using to  
>> figure out what has to get done for Preview. Some of these  
>> priorities might change if we find out that fixing some of these  
>> are particularly easy or difficult.
>> + The 10 unclassified bugs at the top of the page - I am waiting  
>> on some feedback from Ted to figure out where to put these.
>>
>> There were several bugs for which we had questions (this will help  
>> us figure out the right bucket)....
>>
>> + P3: Bug#8067 - Time info getting set in recurrence endDate in  
>> recurrence split
>> 	+ Is this going to affect Desktop users?
>> +P3: Bug#9102 - Changing even title with "All Events" only changes  
>> future
>> + P3: Bug#9063 - Master has location, modification does not.  
>> Possible to support?
>> 	+ Will these bugs screw up data for Desktop users?
>> 	+ Maybe these will get fixed with br's recurrence re-factoring?
>>
>> Next actions for PPD...
>> + Classify the bugs called out above.
>> + We need to look at P4s and P5s to see if there is anything we  
>> think needs to be prioritized higher. I think we can assume at  
>> this stage that P4s and P5s will not get fixed
>>
>> Let me know if you have any comments, questions etc.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sheila
>> _______________________________________________
>> cosmo-dev mailing list
>> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> cosmo-dev mailing list
> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/attachments/20070702/5d70c731/attachment.htm