[Cosmo-dev] new eim record type for event overrides
Grant Baillie
grant at osafoundation.org
Tue Jan 9 17:02:27 PST 2007
On 9 Jan, 2007, at 15:55, Brian Moseley wrote:
> On 1/9/07, Randy Letness <randy at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> Not sure on the naming convention. So should the schema be:
>>
>> eventModification:record?
>> or
>> eventmodification:record ?
>> or
>> modification:record?
>> or
>> eventmod:record?
>
> grant, in the chandler domain model, is this thing known as an "event
> modification" or just a "modification"? is it possible that in the
> future we will support recurring tasks, leading us to defensively name
> this thing, or will "modification" be sufficient?
It's just "modification". Yes, there could in future be recurring
tasks, and I guess their eim records would be different.
It's also possible in principle to have event-task objects whose
events recur, and have modification to task-specific attributes.
--Grant
More information about the cosmo-dev
mailing list