[Cosmo-dev] eim timestamp format
Brian Moseley
bcm at osafoundation.org
Wed Jan 3 17:16:03 PST 2007
On 1/3/07, Brian Moseley <bcm at osafoundation.org> wrote:
> > I don't see any problem with it, although it seems to me that there's no
> > reason to have a primitive type for it in that case; we might as well just
> > use a "Decimal" subtype with an appropriate number of digits, and no
> > decimal places.
er .. what is the appropriate number of digits? :)
can we not rely on 64 bit integers being available?
More information about the cosmo-dev
mailing list