[Cosmo-dev] eim timestamp format
Brian Moseley
bcm at osafoundation.org
Wed Jan 3 17:14:10 PST 2007
On 1/3/07, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
> I don't see any problem with it, although it seems to me that there's no
> reason to have a primitive type for it in that case; we might as well just
> use a "Decimal" subtype with an appropriate number of digits, and no
> decimal places.
ok.
> (In a similar way to how we currently represent UUIDs as a
> "Bytes" subtype.)
you are? i have uuids as strings. if we make them bytes, then we have
to base64 encode the uuids when writing out the xml.
More information about the cosmo-dev
mailing list