[Cosmo-dev] eim timestamp format

Brian Moseley bcm at osafoundation.org
Wed Jan 3 17:14:10 PST 2007


On 1/3/07, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:

> I don't see any problem with it, although it seems to me that there's no
> reason to have a primitive type for it in that case; we might as well just
> use a "Decimal" subtype with an appropriate number of digits, and no
> decimal places.

ok.

>  (In a similar way to how we currently represent UUIDs as a
> "Bytes" subtype.)

you are? i have uuids as strings. if we make them bytes, then we have
to base64 encode the uuids when writing out the xml.


More information about the cosmo-dev mailing list