[Cosmo-dev] Re: [Chandler-dev] Re: [chandler-users] osaf.us updated to Cosmo 0.6.0

[Andre Mueninghoff]

Hi, FWIW, none of the nine collections in question were exports from
Outlook. All events were entered in either Chandler or Cosmo, and by
hand in ics files. For some bug research quests, I would examine ics
files, occasionally hand-editing them to remove recurrence info. I never
saw either the CATEGORIES or RESOURCES fields in the ics files. I did
have an issue with an event in the Andre_Cal and ExtFamily_Cal
collections at the time of my first restore from Cosmo 0.6. I had DND'd
a yearly event from ExtFamily_Cal to Andre_Cal, and then stamped the
first instance in Andre_Cal as a task. However, I was never able to see
the task in any of task views. I synched with Cosmo 0.5, and then found
I could not restore. (I have no record of the error.) Suspecting the
phantom task, I deleted the event from both collections in Cosmo. These
collections were then migrated to Cosmo 0.6. Also, the name of the
yearly event included an apostrophe. 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

Thanks, Andre


On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:41:53 -0800, "Jeffrey Harris"
<jeffrey at osafoundation.org> said:
> Ted Leung wrote:
> > Do we have an idea of how many users are affected by this bug?   Do we
> > need to do a patch against 0.6.0?
> 
> The weird data was caused by the Chandler bug 8240, which will hit:
> 
> 1. Chandler trunk users (not alpha4 users) who
> 2. Have CATEGORIES or RESOURCES fields in imported icalendar data with
> multiple values set.  I think this will mostly be people who've brought
> in data from Outlook.
> 
> My guess is that the size of this group isn't very large.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Jeffrey
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cosmo-dev mailing list
> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev
-- 
  Andre Mueninghoff
  andre_mueninghoff at fastmail.fm