[Cosmo-dev] [Sum] Feb 11-17

[Ted Leung]

Here's the summary of the activity on cosmo-dev for the week of   
February 11, 2007.

New threads:
-------

Pieter Hartsook proposed UI changes for granting tickets
* He was referred to the design list
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002863.html>

Pieter Hartsook requested an inspector UI for collection names and  
was referred to the design list.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002866.html>

Randy Letness had some questions about items in multiple collections  
and EIMM, particularly when items get removed if they are in multiple  
collections
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002869.html>

Randy Letness wondered about the security implications of items in  
multiple collections:
* discussion of the issues ensued, but no concrete resolution had yet  
been reached.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002870.html>

Brian Moseley updated the EIMML spec:
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002875.html>

Morgen Sagen asked to combine triageStatus and triageStatusChanged in  
EIMML - for transport only.
* people agreed
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002881.html>

Morgen Sagen proposed encoding a version number in the EIM record  
type URI's
* Brian Moseley made the changes.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002890.html>

Morgen Sagen (along with Philip Eby) proposed a new record type for  
handling the lastModifiedBy EIM field (in fact the idea would  
generalize to any "last change wins" field)
* After a long discussion the record type was added.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002892.html>

Matthew Eernisse proposed switch the UI buttons to a less graphics  
intensive and more standards compliant design.
* There was universal agreement
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002909.html>

Travis Vachon asked for feedback on workflows for handling "Forgot  
Password" situations
* Randy Letness pointed out that this is really "Reset Password"
* Jared Rhine wanted both workflows that Travis proposed
* Jared Rhine came back with additional feedback based on the  
experience of the Foxmarks team.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002918.html>

Adam Christian posted a first cut at a Known Issues list for Cosmo 0.6
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002927.html>

Brian Moselely responded to Mimi Yin's request for feedback on the  
Cosmo signin dialog.   The major issue is makeing the dialog relevant  
to the various kinds of Cosmo users.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002931.html>

Brian Moseley asked to change the resolution of EIMML timestamps from  
milliseconds to seconds.  He received no reply
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002934.html>

Continuing Conversations:
-------

Discussion of how to handle recurrence modifications continued around  
how to implement the agreed upon modification attribute values in Cosmo.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002851.html>

Discussion of 0.6.1 model changes also continued, the topic was the  
meaning of a DAV move.
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002853.html>

Ted Leung wrapped up the voting on a lighter weight bug council  
process for Cosmo:
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002859.html>

Announcements:
-------

Cosmo 0.6RC3 was built
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002885.html>

Cosmo 0.6RC4 was built
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002916.html>

Cosmo 0.6RC5 was built
<http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/ 
002936.html>