[cosmo-dev] Cosmo 0.11 status

[Aparna Kadakia]

Jared,
I can help verify the following bugs but what test instance should we  
use given lab is still out of commission?

Aparna

On Dec 18, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Jared Rhine wrote:

> All planned changes to Cosmo 0.11 are in the branch.
>
> We got to the point of being able to build a 0.11 Hub-style instance  
> yesterday.  We've found some cases where unit tests fail, but that  
> only seems to happen to me.  There's some indication that it's  
> timezone related.  We're not going to block the release to figure  
> that out.
>
> I don't currently know if we're "automated test clean", like for  
> Windmill.  If QA could list automated test statuses for 0.11 here,  
> we'll confirm if we're close to triple zero.
>
> I see these tickets as deserving a double-check before the triple  
> zero stage:
>
> #8481 Invert text and icon color when a row is selected
> #9818 Users should be allowed to leave Title field blank
> #10238 During collection switch, "loading" box moves to end of load
> #10431 Better error message when user clicks on activate account  
> link 2x
> #10733 Can't log in to hub -- problem with percent char in username?
> #10764 "Starts on" sorting results in unexpected results
> #10866 unstamping recurring event as event results in js error
> #11099 Calendar not refreshing when unstamping eventness from a  
> recurring series
> #11100 Web UI support for BMP unicode characters
> #11125 Collection dialog elements need unique ID's
> #11175 : in username causes chaos
> #11268 Go to date field squishes into the sidebar
> #11341 Change quick entry hint text to Create a new item.
> #11350 IE 7 alert errors in VM when interacting with the canvas
> #11358 DTSTAMP not exported correctly
> #11377 make sure validation works for all form elements in detail view
> #11510 can't save recurring events (All Occurrences) in list view
> #11541 Deleting the last collection in my account leaves me stuck at  
> "Loading"
> #11614 Can't sort list view by date
>
> Mikeal, could you look at 11358?  We're not doing a data migration,  
> but you know more than anyone except Randy about what expected to  
> change from this ticket.  I can take the activate one #10431 so QA  
> doesn't need to create a separate instance for it.
>
> For bug 11681 "bogus VALARMs present on Hub", we'll apply the  
> database changes to Hub directly and not put a data migration into  
> 0.11 (and reconsider for 0.12).
>
> -- Jared
>
> _______________________________________________
> cosmo-dev mailing list
> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev