[cosmo-dev] Release terminology
Randy Letness
randy at osafoundation.org
Tue Dec 11 11:13:37 PST 2007
Aparna Kadakia wrote:
> We don't want to complicate the testing process by adding another
> level of testing checkpoints. QA relies on constantly building from
> sources so verifying bugs will only be faster than waiting for the
> next RC. When QA is done with what we call "certification" (refer to
> Mikeal's original email) , a final RC will be cut, sanity tested by QA
> and ready for release.
>
Ok I was confused. I was under the impression that testing was done on
RC builds only. If testing is done from code built from the most recent
source, then yes there is no need for checkpoint builds. I think my
point was when "Triple Zero" is hit, there is still a high probability
of bugs being found due to new features so its kind of pointless to cut
an RC before these features are tested.
-Randy
More information about the cosmo-dev
mailing list