[Cosmo-dev] This and Future issues
Randy Letness
randy at osafoundation.org
Thu Aug 9 06:54:43 PDT 2007
Brian Moseley wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Randy Letness <randy at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>
>
>> 2. Include's a couple parameters in the request like "thisAndFutureUuid"
>> and "thisAndFutureLastOccurrence" that contains the uuid of the master
>> item that this new series is "breaking" and the last occurrence of the
>> series.
>>
>
> if by request parameter you mean eim field, sure
>
No I was thinking request parameters like in the URL so that the
protocol layer has access to them (like in the time-range queries). I
don't think we can handle this in the eim translation layer because that
layer is designed to operate on a single item. The layer above it is
responsible for actually making the service call to create/delete/update
the item. Since we need a single service call to potentially
create/update/delete multiple items I think we have to handle this
similar to the way we handle startDate changes on recurring items. So
we would have a similar processEntryCreation() method in ItemProvider.
Thinking about it more, we only need a single parameter, which is the
uuid of the occurence or modification that the user is editing. That
gives us the parentUuid and the last recurrenceId.
-Randy
More information about the cosmo-dev
mailing list