[Cosmo-dev] [Proposal] Release terminology

[Heikki Toivonen]

Priscilla Chung wrote:
> There's been some confusion over the Cosmo release terminology. Some of
> the terms used have had different meaning for Chandler releases.

I think the terminology seemed fine except for a couple of cases.

> *Milestone* (ie. dot releases 0.5, 0.6 , 0.7 etc…):

I'd say this is just a release (or Release if you prefer).

In my mind, and in Chandler world, a milestone is different from a release.

> *Alpha*:
> I'm going to suggest that we not use the term 'Alpha' for Cosmo as a
> designation. If features are not finished within a milestone, then the
> team will decide what features to drop and put into the next milestone.

If I understood correctly, these are what we also call milestones in
Chandler. If Cosmo keeps release cycles short, then perhaps you don't
need these.

-- 
  Heikki Toivonen


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/attachments/20060928/779b2e49/signature.pgp